Caroline Pidgeon AM, Leader of the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Group, commenting on the Mayoral Decision to spend a further £1 million of Transport for London’s resources on ‘aviation related matters’, bringing the total budget for work on aviation up to £6.2 million said:
“Once again the Mayor is throwing good money after bad on aviation.
“The Mayor should be explaining why he has already blown over £5 million of TfL’s valuable resources pursuing his misguided ideas for a Thames Estuary airport.
“Instead he is robbing TfL of even further resources.
“Six million pounds could have been far better spent on transport projects that would actually benefit Londoners.”
“From extending the cycle hire scheme into south east London through to delivering step free access at more Tube stations there are literally dozens of ways in which valuable TfL’s resources could have been better spent.”
Notes to editors:
The Mayoral Decision published today directing TfL to spend a further £1 million on aviation work can be seen here:
https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/mayor/mayoral-decisions/MD1544(see paragraph 1.8)
Stephen Knight, Liberal Democrat London Assembly environment spokesperson, commenting on the diesel emissions fixing scandal facing Volkswagen said:
“The unfolding VW emissions fixing scandal is clearly demonstrating that, despite what motor manufacturers have been claiming, there is no such thing as a clean diesel car. Real-world tests show that so-called "clean" (Euro 6) diesels actually emit many times more poisonous gases than they are legally entitled to.
"The Mayor Boris Johnson's current proposals for his 'Ultra Low Emission Zone' (ULEZ) count Euro 6 diesel cars as 'ultra low emission vehicles' allowed to enter central London free of charge. This policy clearly now hangs in tatters and must be revised.
“It is now abundantly clear that no diesel cars should be allowed to enter the ULEZ zone from 2020.
"Central London, like Paris, must become a diesel-free zone."
Caroline Pidgeon AM, Leader of the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Group, commenting on the announcement by Transport for London that they will install opening windows on the new routemasters at a further cost of around £2 million said:
“Anything to make travelling on the new routemasters more bearable during the Summer is obviously welcome. These buses are quite frankly a cauldron on wheels during hot weather.
“However the Mayor must now explain why the needs of passengers were overlooked when he decided to purchase these incredibly expensive buses.
“It simply beggars belief that such expensive buses were ever purchased by the Mayor and TfL with such a basic design fault.”
Caroline Pidgeon AM, Leader of the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Group, commenting on the internal audit of the procurement design and development services for the Garden Bridge said:
"This audit has sadly not been thorough and forensic.
“While it rightly highlights a number of areas where the process for awarding contracts needs to improve the audit is ultimately incomplete due to TfL destroying vital records.
“It is staggering that despite serious questions about the evaluation scores for the tenders TfL thought there was nothing wrong in destroying vital documentation just before the audit was set to take place.
“TfL’s claim that the audit has not found any evidence that value for money was not provided is nonsensical when vital documents could not be examined.
“TfL should be providing evidence that value for money was actually delivered. That test has not been met by this audit.”
Notes to editors:
TfL’’s internal audit of the design and development for the Temple to South Bank Footbridge Project can be seen here:
The audit into the awarding of the design contract for the Garden Bridge was commissioned by Sir Peter Hendy at the request of Caroline Pidgeon. Sir Peter Hendy’s decision to undertake an audit was not shared by the Mayor of London who refused to support an audit.
Commenting on a new report by sustainable transport group Transport & Environment, which shows that every major car manufacturer is selling diesel cars that fail to meet EU air pollution limits on the road in Europe, whilst selling cars with better exhaust treatment systems and lower emissions in the US, Liberal Democrat London Assembly environment spokesperson Stephen Knight AM said:
"It is shocking that the manufacturers can't be bothered to fit proper exhaust treatment systems on the diesel cars they sell in Europe but do fit them when forced to do so by the US authorities. This demonstrates that the manufacturers couldn't care less about the dangerous pollution their diesel cars are producing and simply do the minimum they can get away with to meet legal requirements.
"The EU needs to tighten its regulations to force the manufacturers to clean up their vehicles and until then we must shame the manufacturers into fitting the same exhaust treatment systems to their European models that they already fit to cars sold in the US."
Notes to editors:
Transport and Environment Report: http://www.transportenvironment.org/press/just-one-10-new-diesel-cars-clean-legal-limit-report-finds
Stephen Knight AM, Liberal Democrat London Assembly economic spokesperson, commenting on the decision by Oliver Bonas to become the first high street fashion chain in the UK to become an accredited Living Wage employer, said:
“The retail sector is sadly dominated by very low paying, insecure jobs. It is therefore significant when a high street fashion retailer like Oliver Bonas with stores across London in places such as Battersea, Cheapside, Clapham, Crouch End, Dulwich, Ealing, Kingston, Hampstead, Islington, Kensington, Putney and Richmond pledges to pay the London Living Wage.”
“The problem is that most employers so far signing up to the Living Wage have been organisations that had very few low paid employees in the first place, like banks and insurance firms. The vast majority of low paid employees work in sectors like hospitality and catering, cleaning, social care and retail. These are the sectors where we most need employers to raise their wages.
“Oliver Bonas has now set down a challenge to other retail companies to raise their wages too.”
Caroline Pidgeon AM, Liberal Democrat London Assembly transport spokesperson, commenting on the announcement that the launch of the Night Tube has been deferred said:
"This is a big climb down for the Mayor. His retreat is entirely due to his error in setting a specific start date before all the staffing arrangements and other issues had been settled.
"By pushing for a set start date the Mayor strengthened the union’s negotiating position.
"The Mayor must now also come clean and explain when the expected changes to Night Buses will take place.
"It would be totally wrong if any Night Bus routes see a cut in their weekend service before the start of the Night Tube."
Caroline Pidgeon AM, Leader of the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Group, commenting on the support for a third Heathrow runway by the Davies airport commission said:
“This much delayed report simply repeats many outdated arguments in opting for a third Heathrow runway.
“However many conditions are set ultimately a third Heathrow runway will have devastating consequences for a large section of London in terms of noise and increased air pollution.
“By advocating a third Heathrow runway it seems all the evidence for better using the extensive spare airport capacity at airports such as Stansted have been rejected. The commission’s inability to consider a future with fewer internal and European flights is also depressing.”
New evidence has revealed that in many parts of London there has been an alarming rise in the number of vulnerable children who have gone missing from the care of our local authorities in the last year.
The report London’s Children: Missing From Care, launched today by the London Assembly Member Caroline Pidgeon, provides a detailed picture of theextent of how many children have gone missing and how many times, using freedom of information requests sent to all 32 London Boroughs.
Accurate information was obtained from 21 of London’s boroughs and comparing similar data collected last year it is now possible to accurately compare the changes between 2013 and 2014 in 11 London Boroughs.
In these 11 London Boroughs 231 vulnerable children went missing for more than 24 hours in 2013. A year later in 2014 the number of runaway children had soared to 504 – an increase of 118%.
The increase in runaway children took place both with children placed within London boroughs, but also children placed in care in other councils.
Some examples of the rise in runaway children include:
Enfield: 110 children went missing from care 251 times in the last year. Between 2013 and 2014 the number of children going missing from care increased by 358% from 24 to 110. A closer examination of the statistics shows a staggering 722% increase in missing children in borough placements
Brent: 93 children went missing from care on 172 occasions last year. Between 2013 to 2014 the number of children going missing from care increased by 94% from 48 to 93 children.
Camden: 65 children went missing from care 151 times last year. Between 2013 and 2014 the number of children going missing from care increased by 51% from 43 to 65.
Lewisham: between 2013 and 2014 the number of children going missing from care increased by 164% from 28 to 74 children.
Caroline Pidgeon, commenting on the findings from her report said:
“There is a serious problem with the number of children missing from the care of London Boroughs in every part of London. Not one London Borough can be complacent about this issue.
“A looked after child is already a vulnerable child. If they go missing for 24 hours or more they are immediately at serious risk, such as being drawn into criminal activity or becoming a victim of sexual abuse. Sadly across London there are a number of criminal syndicates which target girls and boys for sexual abuse, often targeting runaway children.
“The recorded figures from boroughs showing a steep rise in runway children over the last year should set alarm bells ringing.
“However, these boroughs at least know how serious the situation is. What is most concerning is the boroughs that fail to accurately collect information or make feeble excuses for not releasing the data.
“Accurate figures for the number of children who runaway form care must be collected by every London council and the data regularly published. Ultimately you can only tackle a problem when you know how serious it is. It is simply wrong that this information has to be obtained through freedom of information requests.
“It says everything about the low priority we give to the protection of children in London that more accurate information is collected about late running tube trains than recording the risks facing London’s most vulnerable children.”
The report also sets out a number of areas for action to provide greater protection to London’s looked after children.